In this episode, Russell, Chris, Tara, and David explore what a testing consultancy could look like if you stripped it back and built it around values, experience, and honest reflection.
Starting with some light-hearted conference banter, the conversation quickly turns to consultancy models, what works, what does not, and what they would do differently.
Outcomes over outputs
A recurring theme throughout the discussion is the importance of focusing on outcomes rather than outputs.
The group reflect on:
- Delivering meaningful change, not just activity
- Avoiding long-term dependency on consultants
- Measuring success by what happens after you leave
Enablement and sustainability
Rather than doing the work for clients, the conversation leans towards:
- Setting up repeatable processes
- Enabling teams to continue without support
- Leaving organisations self-sufficient
The idea of making yourself redundant comes up as a sign of success.
Working with context
The discussion explores how consultants engage with existing client environments:
- When to adapt to existing processes
- When to challenge and improve them
- The importance of pragmatic, context-informed decisions
There is no single answer, but a strong emphasis on informed choice and transparency.
Thought leadership vs “bums on seats”
The group question traditional consultancy models, particularly:
- Staff augmentation
- Long-running placements
- Value tied to time rather than impact
Instead, they explore a model centred around:
- Short-term, high-impact engagements
- Strategic and cultural change
- Supporting teams rather than filling roles
Follow-ups, iteration, and lasting change
A key challenge raised is what happens after consultants leave.
The group discuss:
- Returning at later checkpoints
- Supporting incremental change
- Preventing regression to old habits
The idea is less one-off transformation, more ongoing iteration.
Consultancy as connection
An alternative model emerges during the conversation:
- Acting as a connector of people and expertise
- Matching specialists to specific problems
- Leveraging community rather than a fixed bench
Blurring the line between consultancy, partnership, and network.
Who would this be for?
The group gravitate towards:
- Startups and scale-ups
- Organisations open to change
- Teams looking for guidance, not just delivery
With less interest in:
- Large-scale augmentation
- Traditional long-term consultancy models
This episode explores
- What good consultancy looks like in practice
- Outcomes vs outputs in client engagements
- Enablement and making change stick
- Navigating client context and constraints
- Thought leadership vs staff augmentation
- Alternative consultancy models and community-led approaches
Referenced in this episode
Fiona Charles – 10 Commandments for Ethical Testers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQHt4Pao2Vs
#PeersCon27 (March 11th, 2027) is now LIVE Tickets for the event are live for the Early Bird Price of £15 until November 30th 2027.
And as always, we are looking for sponsors to make this event the success it has been for the last 2 years, get in touch if interested
Twitter (https://twitter.com/testingpeers)
LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/company/testing-peers)
Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/testingpeers/)
Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/TestingPeers)
We’re also now on GoodPods, check it out via the mobile app stores
If you like what we do and are able to, please visit our Patreon to explore how you could support us going forwards: https://www.patreon.com/testingpeers